Section de la route nationale n° 132 Alytus–Seirijai–Lazdijai de 3,080 à 5,100 km

This tender for road repairs shows good overall structure but lacks detail in key areas like evaluation criteria and specific technical requirements, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender adheres to standard EU procurement types and has a clear procedure code. However, the absence of a specified reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight. The CPV code (45233162 - Dviračių takų statybos darbai / Cycle paths construction work) seems misaligned with the tender title (road repair), suggesting a potential discrepancy. There are no reported disputes.

While the title and basic description are present, the tender lacks specific technical capability, financial, and submission requirements. The absence of clearly defined evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and timeline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and while contract duration is specified, the lack of detailed requirements means bidders cannot fully assess the scope without further documentation.

The tender generally provides access to documents and specifies a clear e-procurement process. The lack of disclosed estimated value and detailed, objective evaluation criteria prevents full transparency. However, there are no overtly tailored requirements favouring specific companies identified.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive step. However, it's unclear if e-submission is mandatory or if specific platforms are required. The contract start date is not specified, and the short duration of 3 months for a capital repair project may be impractical depending on the scope.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no flags for suspension or disputes. The CPV code mismatch is the primary inconsistency.

The tender is noted as 'EU Funded', but there are no explicit requirements or mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability score.