Services de modernisation du système d'information de gestion des ressources financières du KAM (procédure négociée)

This tender for financial resource management system modernization is generally well-structured with a good number of supporting documents. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a defined procedure type. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight. No disputes are indicated. The procedure type 'Derybos su išankstiniu kvietimu dalyvauti konkurse ir (arba) konkursas su derybomis' is a valid, albeit complex, procurement method.

The title and description clearly state the purpose of the tender. A significant number of documents are provided, suggesting detailed requirements are available within them. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main tender information reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference number, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the crucial 'Estimated Value' is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are listed, the content summary for several is not extracted, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender utilizes an e-procurement characteristic, which promotes fairness. The procedure type, while complex, is a recognized method. The main concern regarding fairness is the undisclosed estimated value, which can prevent potential bidders from assessing the viability of their bids. No specific company tailoring was identified.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is likely. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, but the contract duration is provided. Financing information is not disclosed. The submission deadline of approximately one month from the date of publication might be considered short for a complex IT modernization project.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV code, and contract duration are populated. The tender status is 'active', and no disputes or suspensions are indicated. Dates are logically presented, with an opening date shortly after the submission deadline.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.