Collecte et élimination des déchets d'amiante

This tender for asbestos waste collection and disposal is generally well-structured but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and sustainability aspects. The estimated value and duration are clear, and the CPV code is appropriate.

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and uses the correct CPV code. While deadlines are present, the opening date is immediately after the submission deadline, which might be tight. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is clear, but the lack of specified evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

The description of services is clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed, impacting overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. Three tender documents are attached, including a contract notice and procurement documents. However, the lack of specific requirements in key areas like exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as missing reveal date, reduces completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the CPV code is appropriate. The use of e-procurement is a positive indicator. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments, potentially impacting fairness.

The tender indicates e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is provided.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logically presented, although the opening date is very close to the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common sustainability considerations in public tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.