Acquisition de services pour l'ajustement du plan général de la ville de Palanga (zone V1)

This tender for the revision of the Palanga city general plan is generally well-structured and adheres to e-procurement principles. Key concerns include the lack of disclosed estimated value and detailed evaluation criteria, which could impact potential bidders' understanding and fairness.

The tender follows the open procedure under EU directives. Deadlines are reasonable for the scope, and the CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is presumed through the use of standard EU procurement codes.

The tender provides a clear title and a brief description of the planning objective. Core documents like the contract draft and general/special conditions are available, although their content analysis is limited. However, evaluation criteria are not specified, impacting overall clarity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial tender documents like 'Specialiosios sąlygos.docx' and 'Bendrosios sąlygos.docx' lack content summaries, hindering full understanding.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. Most documents are available, and the criteria for exclusion/eligibility are not overly specific, suggesting a fair process. The primary concern is the undisclosed value, which can influence fair competition.

The tender utilizes e-procurement for submission. However, the lack of a clear contract start date, alongside a potentially short deadline and missing financial information, reduces overall practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical. The main inconsistency is the absence of the estimated value.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these modern procurement considerations.