Évacuation des déchets alimentaires (LSMUKL)

This tender for food waste removal services in Lithuania is generally well-structured, with a clear CPV code and attached documents. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, and its practicality is reduced by a lack of e-submission detail.

The tender benefits from a clear legal framework (2014/24/ES) and a specified CPV code. The mention of EU funding adds a layer of regulatory adherence. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is debatable without knowing the complexity of the required documentation. No disputes are indicated. The main weakness is the absence of a clear reveal date for submissions.

The tender title and description are concise and specific to the service. Multiple documents are provided, including technical specifications and bid forms, which aids clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and duration. The CPV code is provided, and a substantial number of documents are attached, offering good detail. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders.

The tender is open and uses a standard EU procurement procedure. Access to documents appears to be provided. Criteria for exclusion and qualification are mentioned, though their specifics are within the documents. The disclosure of contract duration and clear CPV code promotes fairness. The absence of specific company tailoring is noted.

While the tender mentions 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is contradictory and creates uncertainty. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the basic information, although documents are listed. The contract start date is not specified, and financing is implied by 'EU Funded'.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV are populated. Dates for submission and opening are logical and sequential. The contract duration and tender validity period are specified. No suspension or disputes are indicated, contributing to strong data consistency.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details, limiting the score in this category.