Construction de la piste cyclable et piétonne Tyzenhauzų g. 5, à Rokiškis, et de la rue Tyzenhauzų dans la ville de Rokiškis

This tender for pedestrian and bicycle path construction in Rokiškis is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and utilizes a standard open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate. While deadlines are present, the short submission window could be a concern. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed estimated value, which can impact legal compliance regarding transparency.

The tender description is concise, and key documents like special conditions, contract draft, and bid forms are provided. Requirements are referenced within the 'specialiosios sąlygos' document, implying clarity within that document. However, explicit criteria for evaluation are missing, which impacts overall clarity for bidders.

Most essential information is present, including title, organization, CPV, contract duration, and numerous supporting documents. However, the estimated financial value is missing, which is a significant omission for a complete tender package. The AI-extracted requirements section is notably sparse, relying heavily on the referenced documents.

The tender is open to all bidders and utilizes e-procurement, promoting fairness. Access to documents appears to be provided. The lack of disclosed financial value and specific, objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as bidders may not fully understand the scope or how their bids will be assessed against a benchmark.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a specific contract start date and the lack of explicit financing information (beyond 'EU Funded') reduce practicality. The submission deadline is relatively short, potentially impacting the practicality for some bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and contract duration are populated. Dates for submission and opening are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The data appears consistent within the provided information.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.