Réalisation d'un terrain de sport multifonctionnel dans le complexe des écoles post-secondaires n° 5 à Łódź - système conception-construction

This tender for the design and construction of a multi-functional sports field is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a good set of supporting documents. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, are notable concerns.

The tender adheres to general procurement regulations with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes or suspensions are indicated. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the subject matter is clear, outlining the 'design and build' nature of the project. Technical requirements are specified, and the conditions for participation are implied through the attached documents, though not explicitly detailed in the main tender text. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a clear description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness. A substantial number of documents are attached, though their content is not fully summarized.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The requirements are focused on technical capabilities and general exclusion grounds, without apparent tailoring to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which slightly reduces transparency. Deadlines are present, and criteria are implied through technical requirements.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is provided. The overall practicality is moderate due to missing key operational details.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.