TEN-2526-043 (PA2023) Outil de suivi numérique

This tender for a digital tracking tool is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document access, impacting transparency.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity of the required solution. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the required digital tracking tool is clear and detailed, outlining the specific functionalities and objectives. Technical requirements are well-defined, and the purpose of the tool is clearly articulated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the crucial tender documents are not accessible or summarized, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The technical requirements are objective and focused on functionality. The primary concern regarding fairness is the lack of explicit information on how to access the full tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, which is a common and practical requirement in modern procurement. Information on financing is not detailed, and the availability of document URLs is not confirmed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within the procurement process.