Travaux de reconstruction de la rue Tirgus (du centre commercial "Elvi" à la station-service "Virši") et de la rue Mazā, Raganā, paroisse de Krimulda

This tender for road reconstruction is active with clear basic information and mandatory technical requirements. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and has potential issues with document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement law with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable given the scope and complexity. No disputes are flagged. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements aligns with regulatory frameworks.

The description of the works is specific, and many documents are attached. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how offers will be assessed beyond meeting minimum technical and financial thresholds.

Most essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and deadline are present. All basic tender documents are attached, providing a good foundation for bidders. However, crucial details for technical and financial capability requirements are noted as 'to be determined from tender documents', which could be clearer upfront.

The tender generally provides access to key documents and discloses the estimated value. The procedure is open, and criteria are objective in principle. However, the flagged 'Restricted document access' is a significant concern for fairness, potentially limiting information available to all potential bidders equally.

The tender is set up for e-submission and specifies the contract start date implicitly through the duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The contract duration is clearly stated, and tender validity is reasonable.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, dates, and value are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are sequential and logical.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.