Extension de la route départementale 875 Mielec - Kolbuszowa - Sokołów Małopolski - Leżajsk, consistant en la construction d'un pont au km 25+968 dans le village de Kolbuszowa Dolna

This tender for bridge construction on DW 875 is generally well-structured with clear basic information and available documentation. However, it lacks detailed technical, financial, and eligibility requirements, and a formal procedure is not specified.

The tender has a clear CPV code and is classified under a relevant NUTS code. The procedure type is listed as 'None', which might indicate a simplified procedure or a lack of formal designation. Regulatory compliance is assumed given the public nature of the tender, but the absence of a specified procedure type warrants attention. Deadlines are provided.

The description of the work, including road and bridge construction, is reasonably clear. The availability of documents with summaries aids understanding. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information like title, reference, organization, and location is present. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Contract duration is also missing, impacting a complete understanding of the project scope. While two documents are available, crucial requirement details (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are explicitly marked as 'No information'.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. All documents are accessible. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the complete absence of specified technical, financial, and eligibility criteria could be perceived as less transparent, potentially disadvantaging bidders.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract start date is not specified. The absence of financing information and contract duration affects overall practicality for bidders planning their resources.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The status is 'active' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline following the publication date (implied).

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender appears to focus solely on the construction requirements.