Retour aux appels d'offres

Concours ouvert de projets pour une idée urbaine dans la partie sud de la ville de Klaipėda, district de Stariškiai

Ouvert
Date limite
36 jours restants
Avril 08, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
5983135
Valeur
Non divulgué
Lieu
Klaipeda County, Lituanie
Publié
Février 23, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Janvier 09, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Avril 01, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Avril 08, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Avril 08, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
Non divulgué
Durée
24 mois
Lieu
Klaipeda County
Type
Autre
68
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€131,412
Offres moyennes
3.9
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
98%
2,076 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Proposition de projet d'idée urbaine dans la partie sud de la ville de Klaipėda, district de Stariškiai. Concours.
Achats écologiques

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

10 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (4)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (2)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Proposals must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-08 13:00:00.
--The submission must include an urban idea project proposal for the Klaipėda city southern sub-center Stariškės district.
--All submissions must adhere to the format and content requirements specified in the official tender documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as defined by Lithuanian public procurement law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities capable of performing architectural and urban planning services.
--Bidders must possess the necessary professional qualifications and licenses for architectural and urban planning services in Lithuania or an equivalent EU member state.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders should demonstrate relevant experience in urban planning or architectural design projects.
--Bidders must propose a team including qualified architects and urban planners.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Specific financial requirements are not detailed in the provided information. Bidders should consult the full tender documents for any requirements regarding financial standing or insurance.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

13 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

2.5 priedasDOC
2-5 priedas.docx

This document provides a link to land plot documents, serving as essential background information for participants in the urban idea project competition in Klaipėda's Stariškės district.

2) STAR - PLANAVIMO DARBŲ PROGRAMA.docxDOC
2) STAR - PLANAVIMO DARBŲ PROGRAMA.docx -- 4.0 MB

This document outlines the planning work program for the urban idea project competition in Klaipėda's Stariškės district, detailing the required tasks and stages.

4) STAR - KAINOS PASIŪLYMAS.docxDOC
4) STAR - KAINOS PASIŪLYMAS.docx -- 37.0 KB

This document is the price proposal required for submission in the Klaipėda urban idea competition, detailing the financial offer.

5-2) STAR - DALYVIO DEVIZO ŠIFRAS.docxDOC
5-2) STAR - DALYVIO DEVIZO ŠIFRAS.docx -- 43.0 KB

This document is a required submission form for participants to provide their unique motto or code, ensuring anonymity during the evaluation of urban design proposals.

5-3) STAR - TIEKĖJO PERSONALO, ATSAKINGO UŽ PIRKIMO SUTARTIES VYKDYMĄ, SĄRAŠAS.d...DOC
5-3) STAR - TIEKĖJO PERSONALO, ATSAKINGO UŽ P... -- 35.5 KB

This document requires bidders to list the key personnel responsible for executing the urban design project contract in Klaipėda's Stariškės district.

5-4) STAR - SUTEIKTŲ PASLAUGŲ SĄRAŠAS.docxDOC
5-4) STAR - SUTEIKTŲ PASLAUGŲ SĄRAŠAS.docx -- 37.6 KB

This document requires bidders to submit a list of previously provided services to demonstrate their experience and qualifications for the urban planning competition.

5-5) STAR - TIEKĖJO DEKLARACIJA DĖL ES 2022-576.docxDOC
5-5) STAR - TIEKĖJO DEKLARACIJA DĖL ES 2022-5... -- 36.0 KB

This document is a supplier's declaration, likely required to confirm compliance with specific EU regulations or tender requirements.

6) STAR - SKAITMENINĖS MEDŽIAGOS PATEIKIMO REGLAMENTAS.docxDOC
6) STAR - SKAITMENINĖS MEDŽIAGOS PATEIKIMO RE... -- 31.8 KB

This document details the regulations for submitting digital materials for the urban idea project competition, ensuring proper format and procedure.

1) STAR - ŽEMĖS SKLYPAS, KAD. NR. 2101-0010-43.pdfPDF
1) STAR - ŽEMĖS SKLYPAS, KAD. NR. 2101-0010-4... -- 932.1 KB

This document provides detailed information about the specific land plot (cadastral number 2101-0010-43) in the Stariškės district, which is the subject of the urban idea project competition.

1) T2-269.pdfPDF
1) T2-269.pdf -- 125.0 KB

This document is a Klaipėda City Council decision to initiate the preparation of a general plan for the Stariškės sub-centre territory, outlining its planning objectives for rational land use and harmonious development.

2) STAR - ŽEMĖS SKLYPAS (MIŠKAS), KAD. NR. 2101-0010-85.pdfPDF
2) STAR - ŽEMĖS SKLYPAS (MIŠKAS), KAD. NR. 21... -- 785.3 KB

This document provides general information about a specific land plot, identified by its cadastral number, which is a forest area relevant to the urban idea competition in Klaipėda.

espd-request.pdfPDF
espd-request.pdf -- 85.1 KB

This document is the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) request, a mandatory self-declaration form for bidders to confirm their eligibility and compliance with qualification criteria for the urban planning competition in Klaipėda.

NoticePDF
Notice_5983135.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an open project competition in Klaipėda's Stariškės district, seeking the best urban idea proposal with monetary prizes for top entries.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

68
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for an urban idea project competition demonstrates good legal compliance and data consistency but suffers from significant clarity and fairness issues due to undisclosed value and missing evaluation criteria.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (Open, referencing 2014/24/ES) and uses an appropriate CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds and ESPD requirements indicate compliance with EU/national regulations. Minor issues include a missing liable person and a slight ambiguity regarding 'Over Sum Limit: No' in conjunction with the EU directive reference.

Missing liable person
Slight ambiguity regarding 'Over Sum Limit: No' vs. 2014/24/ES directive
Clarté60/100

While the project description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders understanding of how proposals will be judged. Financial requirements are also not detailed, impacting overall clarity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Financial requirements not detailed
Exhaustivité70/100

The tender provides most basic information, deadlines, and duration, along with a comprehensive set of supporting documents, including specific land plot details and required forms. However, the estimated value (prize money) is not disclosed, and the lack of evaluation criteria represents a significant gap in completeness.

Estimated value (prize money) not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Équité55/100

E-procurement is enabled, and eligibility/technical requirements appear generic and fair. However, the undisclosed value and, more critically, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromise the transparency and objectivity of the competition, raising significant fairness concerns.

Estimated value (prize money) not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Aspect pratique65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is specified. However, the lack of disclosed financing information (prize value) and explicit document URLs (though documents are listed) slightly reduce practicality. A clear contract start date is also not provided.

Financing information (prize value) not disclosed
Contract start date not explicitly known
Cohérence des données90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency exists between 'Over Sum Limit: No' and the reference to the 2014/24/ES directive, but this is not critical for a project competition.

Minor inconsistency between 'Over Sum Limit: No' and 2014/24/ES directive
Durabilité30/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations into an urban planning project.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social aspects

Points forts

Clear definition of procedure type and CPV code
Comprehensive set of supporting documents provided
E-Procurement enabled for accessibility
Generic and fair eligibility/technical requirements
Good data consistency across populated fields

Préoccupations

Estimated value (prize money) is not disclosed
Crucial evaluation criteria are not specified
Financial requirements are not detailed
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Missing liable person

Recommandations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and their weighting to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated value or prize amounts for the competition to provide bidders with necessary financial context.
3. Integrate explicit sustainability (environmental, social, innovation) requirements into the project brief and evaluation criteria.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline