Retour aux appels d'offres

Concours ouvert de projet architectural pour le parc Pavilnioniai

Ouvert
Date limite
3 jours restants
Mars 06, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
5958518
Valeur
€133,576
Lieu
Vilnius County, Lituanie
Publié
Février 24, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Décembre 22, 2025

Date limite pour les questions

Février 27, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 06, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 06, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€133,576
Durée
86 mois
Lieu
Vilnius County
Type
Autre
68
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€131,412
Offres moyennes
3.9
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
98%
2,076 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Concours ouvert de projet architectural pour le parc Pavilnioniai.
Achats écologiques

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

15 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (3)
Obligatoire (6)
Conformité (2)
Technique (2)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-06 14:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format and language.
--All required documentation (as would be detailed in the full tender documents) must be included.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS6
--The bidder must not be subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, or liquidation proceedings.
--The bidder must not have been convicted of offenses concerning professional conduct.
--The bidder must not have committed grave professional misconduct.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be legally capable of performing the contract.
--The bidder must be registered in a relevant professional or trade register as required by the laws of their country of establishment for providing architectural design services.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must possess the necessary professional qualifications and experience in architectural design, particularly for park projects.
--The bidder must have appropriately qualified personnel to execute the architectural design services.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must demonstrate sufficient financial standing to undertake the contract.
--The bidder must hold professional indemnity insurance relevant to architectural design services.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

12 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Atsakymai į rinkos konsultacijos klausimusDOC
1.1. Protokolo 1 priedas_Atsakymai į RK.docx

This document contains answers to market consultation questions, notably clarifying and revising the qualification requirements for tenderers regarding past public space project experience, reducing the required project size and extending the timeframe.

3.1. Priedas_Sąlygų tikslinimas.docxDOC
3.1. Priedas_Sąlygų tikslinimas.docx -- 58.3 KB

This document provides clarifications or refinements to the tender conditions for the Pavilnioniai Park open architectural project competition.

4.1. Priedas_atsakymu_lentele.docxDOC
4.1. Priedas_atsakymu_lentele.docx -- 51.2 KB

This document is an answer table or form to be completed by companies, detailing their responses and qualifications for the Pavilnioniai Park architectural project competition.

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos BPS APK_20260121.docxDOC
Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos BPS APK_20260121.d... -- 65.0 KB

This document details the general terms and conditions for participating in the open architectural project competition for Pavilnionys Park.

Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos BPS APK_20260121 AKTUALI REDAKCIJADOC
Bendrosios pirkimo sąlygos BPS APK_20260121.d...

This document outlines the general procurement conditions for the open architectural project competition, detailing requirements for proposals, supplier qualification, evaluation procedures, and contract terms.

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos SPS APK_20260121.docxDOC
Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos SPS APK_2026012... -- 110.7 KB

This document details the special procurement conditions and requirements for the architectural project competition for Pavilnioniai Park.

Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos SPS APK_20260121 AKTUALI REDAKCIJADOC
Specialiosios pirkimo sąlygos SPS APK_2026012...

This document outlines the special procurement conditions for the Pavilnioniai Park architectural project competition, detailing general provisions, green procurement requirements, and compliance with EU regulations.

SPS 10 Priedas Grafinės medžiagos reikalavimai.docxDOC
SPS 10 Priedas Grafinės medžiagos reikalavima... -- 46.5 KB

This document details the specific graphic material requirements for the architectural project competition submission.

Sutarties 2 priedas_Techninės užduoties projektas.docxDOC
Sutarties 2 priedas_Techninės užduoties proje... -- 479.1 KB

This document outlines the draft technical specifications for the architectural design services required for the Pavilnioniai Park project, detailing the scope and requirements for bidders.

Sutarties 9 priedas. Projekto keitimų lentelė.docxDOC
Sutarties 9 priedas. Projekto keitimų lentelė... -- 33.1 KB

This contract annex outlines the table for documenting and managing project changes, providing insight into post-award project administration.

NoticePDF
Notice_5958518.pdf

This document is a contract notice for an open architectural design competition for Pavilnioniai Park in Vilnius, Lithuania, with an estimated value of 133,576.12 EUR.

Sutarties 7 priedas. Suteiktu_paslaugu_ir_islaidu_apmokejimo_pazyma.xlsxXLS
Sutarties 7 priedas. Suteiktu_paslaugu_ir_isl... -- 28.8 KB

This document, Contract Appendix 7, outlines the certificate for services rendered and expenses paid, likely detailing the procedures for reporting and payment during the contract execution.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

68
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is of moderate quality, demonstrating good legal compliance and data consistency, but is significantly undermined by the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender defines the procedure type (2014/24/ES, OPEN) and CPV codes correctly. Mandatory exclusion grounds are clearly listed, aligning with EU directives. The 'Status: active' and 'Disputes Count: 0' contradict the automated check's 'Tender suspended' flag; assuming the explicit status is correct, legal compliance is strong. The reveal date is missing, which is a minor point.

Ambiguity regarding 'Tender suspended' flag (assuming automated error)
Missing reveal date
Clarté60/100

The description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-structured. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria for an architectural project competition significantly reduces clarity, as bidders cannot fully understand how their proposals will be judged.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Exhaustivité65/100

Basic information, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are all provided. While documents are attached, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria means a key component for a complete tender, especially for a design competition, is missing.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Équité55/100

Full document access, disclosed value, and e-procurement are positive aspects. Requirements appear generic, and market consultation answers indicate efforts to broaden participation. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria severely impacts fairness and transparency, introducing potential for subjectivity in the assessment process.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria, undermining transparency and objectivity
Aspect pratique70/100

The tender states 'E-Procurement', implying electronic submission, though an automated check flags 'No e-submission', creating an inconsistency. The contract start date is not specified, only the duration. Financing information (estimated value) is available.

Contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement vs. 'No e-submission' flag)
No explicit contract start date
Cohérence des données80/100

Most key fields are populated, with 'Liable Person' being empty. The 'Status: active' and 'Disputes Count: 0' contradict the automated check's 'Tender suspended' flag; assuming the explicit status is correct, data is largely consistent. Dates provided are logical.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Contradiction regarding 'Tender suspended' status (assuming automated error)
Durabilité60/100

The tender includes 'green procurement requirements', which is a positive aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus. The tender is also not EU funded.

Lack of explicit social aspects
Lack of explicit innovation focus

Points forts

Clear basic information and well-defined AI-extracted requirements
Efforts to broaden participation through market consultation
Inclusion of green procurement requirements
E-Procurement enabled for accessibility
Comprehensive set of supporting documents available

Préoccupations

Critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria for an architectural competition
Ambiguity regarding e-submission functionality
Missing contract start date
Lack of explicit social or innovation focus
Contradiction regarding 'Tender suspended' status in automated checks

Recommandations

1. Immediately publish detailed evaluation criteria, including weighting, to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure consistency in all tender information provided.
3. Consider integrating explicit social and innovation aspects into the tender requirements to enhance sustainability.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline