Services de restauration pour l'Université des Sciences Appliquées Stefan Batory pour les années 2026-2028

This tender for catering services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and EU funding noted. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, and the submission process is not fully defined as e-submission.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and EU funding indication. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present but could be considered short given the complexity of preparing a bid. No disputes are reported.

The description of services is clear, and the attached documents provide some detail, including specifications for social clauses. However, crucial information such as evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements is missing, impacting overall clarity.

Key information like the title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The duration of the contract (2026-2028) is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are absent, reducing completeness.

The tender is open to all bidders, and the EU funding aspect suggests a degree of transparency. However, the lack of disclosed value and unspecified evaluation criteria could potentially lead to subjective assessments. The process appears to be e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for fairness.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. While documents are available, the lack of explicit confirmation of e-submission and the absence of financing details (beyond EU funding) and a clear contract start date reduce practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The duration is specified.

The tender mentions social clauses regarding the employment of disabled individuals, which is a positive social aspect. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement or innovation focus, limiting the sustainability score.