HN 1 et 2 (15 et 17) Hornsey Street, HN 3 (13) Hornsey Street et HN 4 (9) Hornsey Street

This tender for cladding services presents a multi-stage procurement process with a clear estimated value and CPV code. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on mandatory exclusion grounds, requiring further information from the e-sourcing portal.

The tender provides a clear CPV code and estimated value. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. The submission deadline is provided, but its reasonableness cannot be fully assessed without knowing the complexity of the pre-qualification stage. No disputes are reported.

The description outlines a multi-stage process including pre-qualification, engagement, formal ITT, shortlisting, and presentations. However, specific evaluation criteria for each stage are missing, and mandatory exclusion grounds are only referenced as being detailed in full documents. Technical capability requirements are also vague at this stage.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code is present. Contract duration and start dates are specified, though noted as estimates. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and crucial details like evaluation criteria and specific exclusion grounds are missing.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides links to the e-sourcing portal for full access and response. The multi-stage process with pre-qualification and presentations is a common practice. There are no immediately apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a reasonable level of fairness.

The tender directs respondents to an external e-sourcing portal for more information and to respond, which is a standard e-submission method. The contract start and end dates are noted as estimates, which can introduce some uncertainty. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, CPV, and submission deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the submission deadline preceding the contract start date.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded.