Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Achat de divers simulateurs haute fidélité

Ouvert
Date limite
11 jours restants
Avril 07, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Fournitures
Référence
166997
Valeur
€677,500
Lieu
Riga, Lettonie
Publié
Mars 22, 2026
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 22, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 31, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Avril 07, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Avril 07, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€677,500
Durée
12 mois
Lieu
Riga
Type
Fournitures
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€36,535
Offres moyennes
2.1
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
100%
23,680 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Achat de divers simulateurs haute fidélité

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

19 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (3)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (7)
Financier (7)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Mandatory application forms for Part 1 are included.
--Confirmation of third-party or subcontractor involvement is required via a specific form.
--Submission deadline: 2026-04-07T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in documents for Part 2, Part 3, Part 5, and Part 7.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in provided summaries, but implied through selection criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Technical specifications for Part 1 are detailed.
--Specific requirements for High-Fidelity Simulator No. 2 are detailed in Part 2.
--Requirements for Part 4 (license with simulated patient ventilator system) are outlined.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS7
--Financial requirements for Part 1 are detailed.
--Financial proposal requirements for Part 2 are detailed.
--Financial proposal requirements for Part 4 are detailed.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

9 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Nolikums un tā pielikumiDOC
10_pielikums_Pers_uz_kuru_iesp_balst_2026_47_... -- 18.1 KB

This document is a form for a third party or subcontractor to confirm their involvement in a tender for the procurement of high-fidelity simulators.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322130329.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for Part 1 of a tender for the procurement of high-fidelity simulators by Rīga Stradiņš University, including mandatory application forms and technical specifications.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for Part 2 of the tender, focusing on the High-Fidelity Simulator No. 2, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_3_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the third part of a tender concerning the acquisition of high-fidelity simulators, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 4.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_4_20260322130330.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for Part 4 of the procurement of various high-fidelity simulators by Riga Stradins University, specifically for a license with a simulated patient ventilator system.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 5.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_5_20260322130330.pdf -- 95.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for Part 5 of a tender, specifically for the acquisition of a military medical trauma mannequin for physiotherapy and first aid, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 6.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_6_20260322130330.pdf -- 95.9 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the procurement of various high-reliability simulators, specifically for the rehabilitation patient auscultation system, part 6 of the tender.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 7.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166997_PD.ANY_1_1_7_20260322130331.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for Part 7 of a tender concerning the purchase of various high-fidelity simulators, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure by Rīga Stradiņš University for the procurement of various high-fidelity simulators, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for high-fidelity simulators is generally well-structured, with clear documentation for most parts. However, a lack of explicit evaluation criteria and potential document access restrictions are noted concerns.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure rules and provides a CPV code (though it's a broad category 0). Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed. No disputes are reported.

Clarté80/100

The requirements for each part of the tender are generally clear and detailed in separate documents. However, the AI extraction notes a lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which could impact bidder understanding.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. The tender is divided into parts, with specific technical specifications provided for most. However, the AI extraction flags potential restricted document access.

Potential restricted document access noted
Équité85/100

The use of an open procedure and e-procurement increases fairness. Value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. While specific requirements for each part are detailed, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness issue. No direct tailoring to specific companies is evident.

Aspect pratique65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the AI extraction notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and needs clarification. Contract start date is not explicitly mentioned. Financing information is not detailed.

Contradiction: E-Procurement noted, but 'No e-submission' flagged
Missing financing information
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, reference, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The AI extraction notes 'No e-submission' alongside 'E-Procurement', which is a minor inconsistency requiring clarification.

Inconsistency between 'E-Procurement' and 'No e-submission' flag
Durabilité50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided information.

Lack of green procurement considerations
Absence of social or innovation criteria

Points forts

Open procurement procedure
Detailed technical specifications per part
Reasonable submission deadline
E-Procurement implementation

Préoccupations

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential document access restrictions
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommandations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria within tender documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to potential bidders.
3. Confirm and clarify the e-submission process.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline