Fourniture et installation d'un pavillon modulaire à l'Institut d'Horticulture

This tender for a modular pavilion demonstrates good legal compliance and clarity in its requirements, supported by a structured e-procurement process. However, the undisclosed estimated value and missing contract duration significantly impact its completeness and fairness for potential bidders.

The tender exhibits strong legal compliance with reasonable deadlines, a clearly defined open procedure, and appropriate CPV codes. It explicitly requires compliance with Council Regulation (EU) 2022/576 and outlines mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating a robust legal framework.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, covering eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects. Crucially, evaluation criteria based on the 'lowest price' are specified in Document 8, providing clear guidance to bidders.

While basic information, deadlines, and required documents are well-provided, the tender lacks two critical pieces of information: the estimated value and the contract duration. These omissions hinder bidders' ability to fully assess the scope and commitment required.

The tender promotes fairness through an open procedure, e-procurement, and objective 'lowest price' evaluation criteria. However, the undisclosed estimated value is a significant barrier to fair competition, preventing bidders from accurately gauging the project's scale and allocating resources appropriately. The 'restricted document access' flag, if it implies difficulty for bidders, is also a concern.

Electronic submission is a strong practical feature. However, the absence of a known contract start date, specific financing details beyond 'EU Funded,' and the overall duration reduces the practicality for bidders in terms of planning and resource allocation. Direct document URLs are also not provided.

The tender information provided is highly consistent. Key fields are populated, dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The internal data is reliable, correcting some inaccuracies from automated checks.

The tender is identified as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, which are essential for a comprehensive sustainability profile.