Supervision des travaux de construction de l'objet « Reconstruction des routes TEN-T à Jēkabpils »

This tender for construction supervision services in Jēkabpils is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and being an open procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the restricted document access which could hinder full legal review by potential bidders.

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are outlined in the provided documents. The conditions for contract award are mentioned (most economically advantageous bid based on price). However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed beyond price.

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and attached documents. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While key documents are listed, the restricted access to some of them impacts the perceived completeness of information available to all potential bidders.

The tender is an open procedure, and e-procurement is utilized, promoting fairness. However, the restricted access to certain documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria (beyond price) raise concerns about the complete fairness of the process, as bidders may not have full visibility into assessment factors.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The duration is specified. The primary practicality issue is the potential difficulty in accessing all necessary documents for submission.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logical and sequential. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of focus on these sustainability dimensions.