Fourniture, installation, exploitation et maintenance de bornes de recharge pour véhicules électriques sur voirie (LEVI)

This tender for EV charging points is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission methods, impacting practicality and clarity.

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and no immediate red flags regarding disputes or regulatory compliance. The estimated value and duration are specified. The deadline, while potentially tight given the scope, is provided.

The description of the service (supply, installation, operation, and maintenance of EV charging points) is clear. The duration is well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of accessible document content and specific details on submission requirements leaves some gaps.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the duration is reasonable. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies an e-submission deadline and contract start date. However, the absence of explicit mention of e-submission as the primary method and the lack of a direct URL for documents reduce practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.