AT1487 Fourniture de services d'agences indépendantes de placement familial

This tender for Independent Foster Agencies is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and technical/financial requirements, and the availability of tender documents needs improvement.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the contract duration. The mention of 'Light Touch Regime' suggests awareness of regulatory frameworks, though the specific application of the Procurement Act 2023 could be clearer. No disputes are reported.

The description of the procurement's purpose and the partnership involved is clear. Eligibility requirements, such as Ofsted registration and geographical scope, are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Basic information like title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific technical and financial requirements reduce the overall completeness.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed. Eligibility criteria are objective. The geographical scope is defined, but the lack of detailed technical and financial requirements could inadvertently favor larger or more established providers if not properly addressed in the full documentation.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.