Renouvellement de licences Autodesk

This tender for Autodesk licence renewals is generally well-structured with clear descriptions and a straightforward evaluation process, though opportunities exist to enhance completeness and practicality of submission.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles, with a clear CPV code and a stated open competition procedure below the threshold. Deadlines appear reasonable for a below-threshold tender. No disputes are reported. The core legal aspects are covered.

The description of the required Autodesk licences is specific and detailed, including quantities and types. The evaluation criterion (price only) is clearly stated. Conditions regarding indicative quantities are also transparent.

Most essential information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the absence of specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds and a reveal date for documents represents a gap. The AI-extracted requirements highlight a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds.

The tender is described as an 'open competition', suggesting a fair process. The evaluation solely on price is objective, and while licence types are specific, they relate to commonly used software. There's no indication of tailoring to a specific company. The value is disclosed, and the process is below the threshold.

The tender is active, and the contract start date is provided. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the lack of explicit mention of e-submission or document URLs makes assessing full practicality challenging based on the provided text. The duration is clear.

Key fields like title, organization, value, deadlines, and contract duration are populated and appear logically consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to good data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender details. The funding source is not specified, and it is not explicitly stated as EU-funded.