Nomination et gestion de l'équipe de conception multidisciplinaire pour le remplacement de l'installation de crémation et l'expansion du site de GYBC

This tender for the Great Yarmouth Crematorium project is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria presents minor concerns.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are indicated.

The description of the project and the required services is clear and detailed, outlining specific facility improvements. The technical requirements are well-documented, and the criteria for selection, while not explicitly detailed, are implied through the technical capabilities sought.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The contract start date is provided, but the availability of full tender documents with content is limited.

The tender is open, and the requirements are generally objective, focusing on technical capabilities. The mention of 'local sourcing where possible' is a positive aspect for fairness. The lack of disclosed financial value is a minor detractor, but overall fairness is good.

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits the practicality assessment. The document URL is not explicitly provided in the extract.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.