Service d'intervention précoce, de prévention et de soutien en matière de santé sexuelle pour les jeunes de Newcastle (11-25 ans)

This tender for early intervention sexual health services is generally well-structured, with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (below threshold open competition) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure is described as 'open competition', suggesting a standard legal framework.

The description of the service and its value is clear, with a breakdown of annual costs and an option to extend. The target age group and service type are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means potential bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean crucial information for bidders is missing.

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, which promotes fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The deadline, while provided, is flagged as potentially short, which could impact a broader range of potential bidders.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make it less practical for potential bidders to prepare and submit their proposals effectively.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for the contract duration and start are logical and consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.