Fourniture d'une baie de disques pour l'Université des Sciences Appliquées Stefan Batory

This tender for a disk array is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a specified deadline. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission.

The description of the required item (disk array) is clear, and the CPV code is provided. The existence of three documents, including a form template and a tender notice, suggests structured information is available, although content summaries are limited.

Key information such as the estimated value, contract duration, and financing details are missing. While basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadline are present, the lack of financial and contractual specifics reduces overall completeness.

The tender appears fair as it uses e-procurement and does not indicate any requirements tailored to specific companies. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency, but the overall structure suggests an objective process.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. However, the short submission deadline (7 days) and the absence of information regarding contract start date and duration limit practical assessment for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details, indicating a lack of focus on these sustainability criteria.