CWC25029 – Réparations Réactives des Tissus de Bâtiment

This tender for building fabric repairs is generally well-structured with a clear description of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting completeness and potentially fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are noted. The 'Below threshold - open competition' procedure suggests adherence to relevant financial limits.

The description of services is detailed, outlining the scope of works, property portfolio, and response times. The requirements for technical capability are clearly extracted. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are described objectively, focusing on service delivery capabilities. The lack of specific evaluation criteria could be a concern, but the absence of tailored requirements for specific companies is positive.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits the practicality for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is plausible following the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.