Construction d'un entrepôt de défense civile et de protection civile à l'adresse ul. Sejneńska 84 (formule conception-construction)

This tender for a civil defense warehouse in Suwałki is generally well-structured, with a clear description and a good set of available documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. The submission deadline is provided, and the organization is clearly identified. There is no indication of disputes. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural gap.

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the project as a 'design and build' for a civil defense warehouse. The purpose and some intended equipment are mentioned. However, the absence of explicitly documented technical, financial, and eligibility requirements within the main tender notice means bidders must rely heavily on the attached documents for full understanding.

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While 14 documents are available, the lack of explicit mention of evaluation criteria and detailed requirements in the main notice reduces overall completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes transparency. The full set of documents is available, and the contract draft is provided. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but the overall process appears objective.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a submission deadline and contract duration. However, crucial information such as the contract start date and financing details are missing. The absence of explicit e-submission instructions within the main notice, despite the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, could be a minor hurdle.

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present, and the contract duration is specified. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.