Réalisation des travaux de conception, suivie des travaux de construction et de fourniture d'équipement basés sur ceux-ci, dans le cadre de la tâche "Modernisation de l'auditorium et de la grande scène du Théâtre d'Animation de Poznań"

This tender for the modernization of the Animation Theatre in Poznań is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a defined CPV code. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, CPV code, and a clear procedure type. The deadline is specified. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor concern for full regulatory compliance in some jurisdictions.

The description of the works is clear, outlining design, construction, and equipment supply. The AI-extracted technical requirements are detailed, and the reference to a functional-utility program (SWZ) indicates where further specifics can be found. The CPV code is appropriate.

Key information such as the title, organization, and deadline are present. The CPV code and location are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, which are significant omissions for a complete tender document.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The technical requirements appear objective and focused on capability. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully assess the tender's fairness and their chances of success.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a document URL for the SWZ. The submission deadline is clear. However, the absence of disclosed financing information and contract duration limits the practical assessment for potential bidders.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.