Prestation de soutien d'instructeur de formation d'aventure (ATI)

This tender for Adventurous Training Instructor Support is generally well-structured with clear objectives and scope. Key concerns include the lack of specified evaluation criteria and limited access to detailed documentation.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are present. However, the absence of a reveal date for documents and the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria are minor procedural concerns. No major disputes or regulatory non-compliance are evident from the provided information.

The description of the required services (JSAT and ALeRT training) is clear, detailing the purpose, activities, and locations. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are reasonably well-defined based on the provided text. However, the lack of specific financial and submission requirements leaves room for interpretation.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date are present. The description is comprehensive. However, the absence of accessible content for the attached tender documents is a significant drawback, limiting completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, which promotes broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed. While specific requirements are outlined, the absence of specified evaluation criteria could lead to perceived subjectivity. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission also slightly impacts fairness.

The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission is a notable practical drawback. Details on financing and the specific URL for submitting documents are also missing, hindering practical application.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided for submission deadline and contract start appear logical in sequence.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common elements in modern sustainability considerations for public tenders.