Fourniture de services d'organisation de voyages d'affaires pour les besoins du Service d'État de protection des plantes

This tender for business trip organization services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline is reasonable. However, the restricted access to key documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums') raises concerns about full regulatory compliance and transparency.

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented within the provided tender documents. The conditions for participation are outlined, although specific evaluation criteria are missing, which slightly impacts overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration (implied by tender validity), and deadlines. However, the absence of explicit financial requirements for bidders and a clearly specified contract start date leaves some gaps.

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses objective criteria for exclusion and eligibility as per the referenced documents. The process is e-procurement and WTO/GPA compliant. However, the restricted access to essential documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums') limits full document access for all potential bidders, potentially impacting fairness.

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the provided information does not explicitly confirm e-submission capabilities or provide a direct URL for document submission. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.