Réalisation de travaux de construction et d'installation au Centre médical et social de formation professionnelle et continue de Rzeszów.

This tender for construction and installation works in Rzeszów is generally well-structured, with a clear description and ample documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a proper CPV code and is marked as EU funded. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is not fully assessable without knowing the scope complexity. No disputes are indicated.

The title and description are clear, outlining the scope of construction and installation works. The existence of detailed technical specifications (OPZ) in attachments enhances clarity. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While numerous documents are attached, the lack of explicit financial information and contract duration reduces completeness.

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, promoting fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to subjective assessments. However, the availability of all documents and the general nature of the requirements suggest a reasonable level of fairness.

The tender is active and uses E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date, financing details, and contract duration makes it less practical for potential bidders to fully assess their capacity and planning.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical. The only minor inconsistency is the unspecified procedure type.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.