Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.
Se connecterPassez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.
Se connecter15 exigences dans 5 catégories
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes
4 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA
The House of Commons and Lords are planning to establish an £2.584M open framework for independent investigators to assess cases of bullying, harassment, and sexual misconduct within Parliament over an 8-year period.
This OCDS Release Package provides structured data about the tender for independent investigators to assess misconduct cases for the House of Commons' ICGS.
The House of Commons seeks independent investigators to join a framework for its Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme, assessing cases of bullying, harassment, and sexual misconduct across Parliament and recommending findings based on policy breaches.
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents
This tender is clear on service description and timeline but suffers from significant deficiencies in evaluation criteria, e-submission, and document integrity, impacting overall quality and fairness.
The tender benefits from a reasonable submission period and clearly defined procedure type and CPV code. However, the missing reveal date, an empty OCDS Record document, and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the summaries raise concerns regarding full disclosure and data integrity.
The service description and core requirements are clear and understandable. Nevertheless, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, significantly hindering bidders' ability to prepare effective and targeted proposals.
While basic information, value, and duration are present, the tender is incomplete due to the 'OCDS Record - File not found or empty' issue. Crucially, the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion and financial requirements in the summaries represent significant gaps.
The disclosed value and reasonable submission deadline are positive. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission also creates barriers to equal access, and the empty OCDS document impacts overall transparency.
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. Additionally, the lack of explicitly stated financial requirements in the summaries could complicate bid preparation for potential suppliers.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' and 'Code' fields are empty, and there is a minor value discrepancy between the estimated value and the amount stated in one document. The 'OCDS Record - File not found or empty' also indicates a data integrity issue.
The tender does not explicitly integrate green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. While the service itself addresses social misconduct, the procurement process does not leverage opportunities to promote broader sustainability objectives from suppliers.
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes
Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes
Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.
Bonjour ! Je suis votre assistant IA pour cet appel d'offres. Je peux vous aider à comprendre les exigences, les délais, les critères d'admissibilité et vous fournir des informations stratégiques.
Aucune carte de crédit requise