Conception de l'éclairage public, supervision de l'auteur, construction et installation de l'éclairage dans la municipalité d'Ādaži

This tender for street lighting design, supervision, construction, and installation in Ādaži municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria slightly impacts fairness and completeness.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. Regulatory compliance is implied through the reference to 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. No disputes are noted. The main concern is the lack of explicit mention of dispute resolution mechanisms.

The description of the works is clear, and the technical requirements are detailed across multiple documents. The conditions for participation are outlined in the 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem'. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, duration, and organization. Key documents like technical specifications and regulations are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. Access to most documents is provided, and the process is e-procurement enabled. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are outlined. The main concern is the lack of disclosed estimated value, which can affect fair competition, and the potential for restricted document access.

The tender is e-procurement enabled, which is positive. A contract duration is specified. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the potential for restricted document access could hinder practical application for some bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active and not suspended. Dates are logical. No disputes are reported, contributing to high data consistency.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a moderate score as these aspects are not actively promoted.