Appel d'offres 36/2025 – Rénovation du centre communautaire de Meigh, Meigh, Co Armagh.

This tender for the Meigh Community Centre refurbishment is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detail in key areas such as evaluation criteria and specific submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure (open competition below threshold), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though the submission deadline could be tighter. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works is clear and detailed, outlining the scope of refurbishment. Eligibility requirements are also well-defined, specifying the necessary construction capabilities. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of specific technical capability, financial requirements, and detailed submission requirements, along with no document content available, significantly reduces completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility are objective. The procedure is standard for below-threshold tenders. The lack of specific tailored requirements to any company is a positive aspect.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission, a direct document URL, and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders. The submission deadline, while active, might be considered short for a comprehensive refurbishment project.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent with the tender's active status.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.