Construction d'un complexe récréatif et de loisirs, comprenant la construction d'une aire de jeux et d'éléments d'architecture paysagère à Medynia Głogowska

This tender for the construction of a recreational facility is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines appear reasonable given the submission date. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is active and appears to be in compliance with general procurement regulations.

The description of the project is clear, outlining the construction of a playground and architectural elements. The attached documents provide necessary forms and notices. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity for bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. The CPV code and location are specified. However, the estimated value and contract duration are not disclosed, and crucial requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are not detailed within the provided data, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The full document access is implied by the availability of attachments. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, although no specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of explicit information regarding e-submission details, contract start date, and financing information limits its practicality for potential bidders. The deadline, while active, might be considered short without further context.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and location are consistent. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.