Services de planification des transports NWFRS

This tender for Transport Planning Services is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall practicality and legal compliance.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and a missing reveal date are notable omissions that could lead to procedural challenges. The deadline, while active, might be considered short given the scope of work and the need for document review.

The description of the required transport planning services is detailed and specific, outlining key deliverables such as transport statements, assessments, travel plans, and highway adoption management. The technical requirements are well-documented, making it clear what is expected from bidders.

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specific submission requirements leave gaps in the completeness of the tender package.

The tender appears fair, with an open competition procedure and a disclosed value. The criteria, while not explicitly listed for evaluation, are described in the technical requirements, suggesting an objective basis for selection. The use of e-procurement is implied by the platform, but not explicitly stated as mandatory.

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document content reduce its practicality. Financing information is not detailed, and the duration is provided.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent within itself.

The tender mentions 'Sustainable Transport Measures' in relation to BREEAM Credit Tra 02, indicating a minor consideration for environmental aspects. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation as distinct criteria.