Construction d'un entrepôt OLIOC avec partie sociale et niveau souterrain comme structure de protection : abri de type U-1

This tender for the construction of a warehouse and protective structure is generally well-documented, with a clear description and numerous attached documents. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing and contract duration, impacting practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure. The submission deadline is noted, but its reasonableness is not fully assessable without knowing the project's complexity. No disputes or suspensions are indicated.

The title and description of the construction project are clear. A significant number of documents are provided, offering detailed technical information. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadline. A substantial number of documents are attached, covering various aspects of the project. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor concern for transparency. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair approach to eligibility.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of disclosed contract start date, contract duration, and financing information hinders practical planning for potential bidders. The submission deadline might be tight given the project's scope.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the status is active. No disputes or suspensions are noted, and the dates appear logical within the context of an active tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is EU funded, which may imply adherence to certain standards, but these are not detailed here.