Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.
Se connecterPassez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.
Se connecter15 exigences dans 5 catégories
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes
5 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA
This document provides instructions on how to register and use Historic England's In-tend e-tendering portal to access, express interest in, and submit tender documents.
This OCDS record provides structured data about Historic England's open tender for security services at its Cambridge office, encompassing key control, building access, and alarm response.
Historic England requires a security service for its Cambridge office, including key control (BS 7984), building locking/unlocking, and alarm response.
Historic England seeks a security service for its Cambridge office, Brooklands House, including key control (BS 7984), locking/unlocking, and alarm response, with an estimated value of £40,000 and a 70% quality / 30% price evaluation.
Historic England requires a security service for its Cambridge office, Brooklands House, encompassing key control (BS 7984), building locking/unlocking, and alarm response, with evaluation based on 70% quality and 30% price.
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents
This tender documentation is generally clear and practical, but its fairness and completeness are impacted by the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria. Sustainability aspects are entirely absent.
The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and there are no disputes. The absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds in the summaries is a minor oversight, but the overall legal framework appears sound for a below-threshold open competition.
The service description and technical requirements are clear. The evaluation criteria weighting (70% quality, 30% price) is stated, but the detailed criteria for the 70% quality component are missing, which reduces clarity for bidders on how to best demonstrate their capabilities.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are present, and documents are available. However, the primary gap is the lack of a detailed breakdown for the 70% quality evaluation criteria, which is crucial for a comprehensive tender.
The value is disclosed, e-procurement is supported, and requirements do not appear tailored. However, the absence of detailed, objective criteria for the 70% quality component significantly impacts objectivity and transparency, potentially leading to subjective evaluation.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, making the process practical for potential bidders.
While some fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are empty, the dates are logical. A notable inconsistency exists between the automated check's claim of 'No evaluation criteria specified' and the content summaries explicitly stating '70% quality and 30% price'.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.
Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes
Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes
Bonjour ! Je suis votre assistant IA pour cet appel d'offres. Je peux vous aider à comprendre les exigences, les délais, les critères d'admissibilité et vous fournir des informations stratégiques.
Aucune carte de crédit requise