Entretien, vérification et étalonnage des appareils de mesure de la teneur en alcool dans l'air expiré

This tender for servicing and calibration of breathalyzer devices is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting practicality and completeness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear CPV code, disclosing the estimated value, and having a defined submission deadline. The procedure is not explicitly stated as 'None', which is unusual but not necessarily a violation if the context implies a standard procedure. No disputes are reported. The deadline of April 8th for a March 26th notice might be considered tight by some, but is not definitively unreasonable without further context on the complexity of the required documents.

The description of services is clear and specific, including the type of devices to be serviced. The technical requirements are well-defined, focusing on the core competencies needed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Essential information such as the title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are present. The contract duration is specified. Two tender documents are available, which is a positive. However, critical details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and submission requirements are explicitly marked as 'No information', significantly reducing the completeness of the tender package.

The tender appears fair by disclosing the estimated value and providing access to the main tender documents. The technical requirements are objective and related to the service. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, which enhances fairness.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process, but specific details on how to submit documents electronically are missing. The contract start date is not specified. While financing information is not explicitly required in this section, its absence could be a minor concern for some bidders. The short contract duration of 6 months is noted.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (notice date and submission deadline) are logically ordered. The CPV code is appropriate for the service.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.