Parc aquatique Quomps - Contrat d'exploitation, de maintenance et d'entretien saisonnier (2026-2029)

This tender for the Quomps Splash Park operation and maintenance is generally well-structured, with a clear description of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a typical range for this type of procurement. The absence of a 'reveal date' is a minor oversight.

The description of services is detailed and comprehensive, clearly outlining the operational, servicing, and maintenance requirements for the splash park. The AI-extracted requirements further break down these needs effectively. The conditions for compliance with UK standards are also clearly stated.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for bidders are missing, reducing overall completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are generally objective and service-oriented, not tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied by the structure, but not explicitly confirmed. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria.

While the contract start date and duration are clear, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of document content reduce practicality for potential bidders. Information on financing is not provided, which is a common element in practical tenders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. The contract start date follows the submission deadline, which is consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which limits its sustainability score.