Retour aux appels d'offres

Accord-cadre pour les services d'arboriculture

Ouvert
Date limite
23 jours restants
Mars 27, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Autre
Référence
015531-2026
Valeur
£480,000
Lieu
Eastern Scotland, Royaume-Uni
Publié
Février 24, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 20, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 20, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 27, 2026

Budget
£480,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Eastern Scotland
Type
Autre
47
Score de qualité/100
Acceptable

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'Université de Stirling cherche à désigner un fournisseur pour fournir des services d'arboriculture. NOTE IMPORTANTE : Ce contrat exige une disponibilité de réponse d'urgence sur site dans un délai maximum de 2 heures.

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

5 exigences dans 2 catégories

Soumission (3)
Technique (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submit bid by 2026-03-27T12:00:00+00:00.
--Bid must be for arboricultural services.
--Bid must cover a contract duration of 36 months.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Ability to provide arboricultural services.
--Emergency response time availability no later than 2 hours to be on-site.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

Aucun document traité n'est disponible pour cet appel d'offres.

Les documents apparaîtront ici une fois qu'ils auront été téléchargés et analysés.

47
Acceptable

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender suffers from critical deficiencies due to the complete absence of accessible document content and missing evaluation criteria, severely undermining its completeness, clarity, legal compliance, and fairness. While basic information is present, the core documentation required for a transparent and competitive process is unavailable.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale65/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes. However, the critical absence of a reveal date and the explicit flagging of missing evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues, hindering transparency and proper process. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarté55/100

The service description and the critical emergency response requirement are clear. However, the overall clarity is severely hampered by the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria and, more importantly, the unavailability of the actual tender document content for review.

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Exhaustivité35/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of content for all four listed tender documents and the explicit lack of evaluation criteria. This means essential information for bidders is missing.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Équité25/100

Fairness is severely compromised by the complete lack of access to tender document content and the explicit absence of evaluation criteria. Bidders cannot adequately prepare or understand the basis of award, creating an uneven playing field. The missing reveal date also impacts the assessment of a fair preparation period.

No document content available
No evaluation criteria specified
Aspect pratique45/100

While 'E-Procurement' is listed, the automated check indicates 'No e-submission,' creating ambiguity. The absence of actual document content (even if URLs exist) and a known contract start date reduce the practicality for potential bidders to engage effectively.

No document content available
Ambiguity regarding e-submission
Cohérence des données75/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logically consistent (submission in future). However, minor inconsistencies exist, such as the empty 'Liable Person' field, missing codes for Type/Procedure, and the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated check.

Empty 'Liable Person' field
Missing Type/Procedure codes
Durabilité25/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

No green procurement
No social criteria

Points forts

Clear title, organization, and service description
Estimated value and contract duration are specified
CPV and NUTS codes are provided
Procedure type is clearly defined as 'Open'
Includes a critical operational requirement (2-hour emergency response)

Préoccupations

No tender document content available for review
No evaluation criteria specified
Missing reveal date, impacting transparency and assessment of preparation time
Ambiguity regarding e-submission functionality
Lack of sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations

Recommandations

1. Immediately publish all tender documents with full content, including detailed specifications and terms.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria and their weighting to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Provide the tender reveal date for full transparency and to allow assessment of the bidding period.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline