« Rénovation de l'infrastructure publique sur le terrain de sport et l'école primaire de Kiszkowo, y compris la reconstruction du système de communication - ÉTAPE I »

This tender for public infrastructure revitalization in Kiszkowo is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable CPV code. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria impacts completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to standard procurement practices with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present, but their reasonableness is debatable given the scope. No disputes are reported.

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the scope of work for infrastructure revitalization. The attached documents, including the SWZ, provide detailed information. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which could lead to ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While numerous documents are attached, the absence of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements within the main tender description is noted.

The tender appears fair with full document access and e-procurement characteristics. The absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a slight lack of transparency, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies. Deadlines are present but could be tight.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting online submission. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is provided. Financing information is not detailed. The deadline, while present, might be considered short for the scope of work.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is appropriate. No suspension or disputes are indicated. Dates are logical within the context of an active tender.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided description or identified requirements.