Extension du réseau de drainage et construction d'une station de pompage et d'un entrepôt pour produits phytosanitaires, y compris la réalisation des travaux de construction pour la pépinière de Brzeźno

This tender for construction works is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a good set of supporting documents. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria are notable weaknesses.

The tender adheres to general regulatory compliance with a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, though the submission deadline might be tight. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of a disclosed estimated value, which can impact transparency.

The description of the works is detailed, particularly the technical specifications for the pump house and irrigation system. Requirements are documented within the provided attachments, and the criteria for evaluation, while not explicitly stated, can be inferred from the detailed technical specifications and required documents.

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is missing, which is a significant omission. A comprehensive set of documents is attached, covering technical specifications, cost estimates, and legal declarations.

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the availability of a full set of documents. The criteria, while not explicitly listed, are based on technical capabilities and documentation, suggesting objectivity. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the lack of explicit information regarding contract start date and financing details reduces practicality. The long contract duration of 48 months is clearly specified.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and contract duration are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is correctly assigned.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded. Therefore, sustainability aspects are not a focus of this procurement.