Prestation de supervision de l'investisseur sur l'exécution des travaux de construction liés à la revitalisation de la nécropole militaire au cimetière paroissial rue Bolesława Limanowskiego à Ostrów Wielkopolski

This tender for investor supervision services is generally well-structured with a clear description and ample documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a specified procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context, and no disputes are noted. The organization is clearly identified.

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the scope of services. While most requirements are expected to be detailed within the numerous attached documents, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main notice is a minor drawback.

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details such as contract duration and financing information are missing from the main tender notice, requiring bidders to infer them from attached documents.

The tender is characterized by e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a common practice but can sometimes obscure transparency. Requirements are not tailored to specific companies, indicating a good level of fairness. Full document access is implied by the number of attachments.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent from the main notice. The submission deadline is relatively short, which might pose a practical challenge for some bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is active.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This suggests a lack of focus on these sustainability criteria.