Parc aquatique Quomps – Contrat d'exploitation, d'entretien et de maintenance saisonnière (2026-2029)

This tender for the Quomps Splash Park operation and maintenance is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by specifying a CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is mentioned as a requirement for the contractor.

The description of services is detailed and comprehensive, outlining specific operational tasks, testing, maintenance, and supply requirements. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify the expected technical capabilities. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description is thorough. However, the lack of available document content and specific submission requirements means crucial details for bidders are not immediately accessible, reducing overall completeness.

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for competence are mentioned. The procedure is below threshold, which typically implies a less complex but still open process. No specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The contract start date is shortly after the submission deadline, which is reasonable. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, ensuring data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these important areas.