Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Aménagement paysager du parc de Kalupes à Kalupes, municipalité d'Augšdaugava, phase 1

Ouvert
Date limite
4 jours restants
Mars 31, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
166142
Valeur
Non divulgué
Lieu
Latgale, Lettonie
Publié
Mars 11, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
lowest price100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 11, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 24, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 31, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 31, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
Non divulgué
Durée
Non spécifié
Lieu
Latgale
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€491,981
Offres moyennes
3.0
Concurrence
Faible
PME gagnantes
99%
20,606 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

Aménagement paysager du parc de Kalupes à Kalupes, municipalité d'Augšdaugava, phase 1
Financement UE

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

9 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (2)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (1)
Technique (4)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-03-31T11:00:00.
--The bid evaluation criterion is the lowest price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in the tender documentation.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the selection criteria specified in the tender documentation.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Technical proposal requirements are detailed in the tender documentation.
--Construction work volumes are specified in the 'Būvdarbu apjomu saraksts' documents.
--Design documentation for the landscaping is provided in 'Būvprojekta dokumentācija'.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Financial proposal requirements are detailed in the tender documentation.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 2.versijaPDF
166142_PD.ANY_1_2_1_20260310143136.pdf -- 96.9 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for the Kalupes park territory improvement project.

Būvdarbu apjomu saraksts (groz.10.03.2026.)XLS
Buvdarbu_apjomu_saraksts_ar_groz_10.03.2026.x... -- 30.9 KB

This document contains a list of construction work volumes, including details on site preparation, canopy construction, and roofing for the Kalupes Park territory improvement project.

Atbildes Nr.1DOC
EIS_atbilde_1.docx -- 18.6 KB

This document contains clarifications and amendments to the tender documentation for the "Kalupes Park Area Improvement in Kalupē, Augšdaugava Municipality, Phase 1" project, addressing questions about wood treatment, material quantities, and construction details.

Nolikums ar pielikumiem, t.sk. līguma projektsDOC
Nolikums_ANPCP_2026_18_Kalupes_parka_labiekar... -- 801.7 KB

This document contains the regulations and contract draft for an open tender concerning the landscaping of Kalupes Park in Augšdaugava Municipality, with the bid evaluation criterion being the lowest price.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166142_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260227052040.pdf -- 96.8 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the landscaping of Kalupes Park in Augšdaugava Municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Būvprojekta dokumentācijaDOC
1 Skaidrojošais apraksts - skaidrojosais-apra... -- 16.5 KB

This document contains the design documentation for the landscaping of Kalupes Park, outlining plans for two phases of development including an amphitheater, dance floor, canopy, entrance gates, and a viewing platform.

Būvdarbu apjomu sarakstsXLS
Buvdarbu_apjomu_saraksts.xlsx -- 31.1 KB

This document contains a list of construction work volumes for the Kalupes park area improvement project, including details on leveling, canopy construction, and roofing materials.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the landscaping of Kalupes Park in Augšdaugava municipality, Latvia, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for Kalupes Park landscaping is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has potential access restrictions, impacting overall quality.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the tender's timeline. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the presence of standard tender elements.

Clarté80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented across several provided files, including technical specifications and work volume lists. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main notice or summaries reduces overall clarity on how bids will be assessed beyond the stated 'lowest price'.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond 'lowest price'.
Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a clear description. Deadlines and the tender's validity period are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated, which are key components for a complete tender.

Estimated value not disclosed.
Contract duration not explicitly stated.
Équité85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement systems promotes fairness. The disclosure of the 'lowest price' as the evaluation criterion is objective. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all interested parties, which could impact fairness.

Potential restricted document access.
Aspect pratique65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag indicates that the submission method might not be fully electronic, which can reduce practicality. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

Potential lack of full e-submission.
Contract start date not specified.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced. The tender validity period is also specified.

Durabilité50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, indicating a lack of explicit focus on these areas.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit social criteria.

Points forts

Clear project description and title.
Well-defined CPV code and location.
Multiple supporting documents provided (technical specs, work volumes, clarifications).
Active e-procurement system usage.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Préoccupations

Estimated value not disclosed.
Missing explicit evaluation criteria beyond lowest price.
Potential restricted document access.
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation focus.

Recommandations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly state all evaluation criteria, not just the lowest price.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline