Consultant en ingénierie civile et structurelle pour la nouvelle aile

This tender provides a clear description of the required services but suffers from significant gaps in transparency regarding evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission, impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clearly defined procedure type and appropriate CPV codes. However, the missing reveal date and the deferral of explicit evaluation criteria to a separate document (PSQ) present minor transparency risks.

The description of the Civil and Structural Engineering Consultant's role and technical requirements is highly detailed and unambiguous. Nevertheless, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the reliance on the Pre-Selection Questionnaire (PSQ) for eligibility, financial, and exclusion grounds significantly reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are well-provided. The service description and technical requirements are comprehensive. However, the tender is incomplete without explicit evaluation criteria and full details of eligibility, financial, and exclusion grounds, which are only referenced in the PSQ. The failed download of one document also indicates a minor completeness issue.

Fairness is significantly compromised by the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which prevents bidders from fully understanding how their proposals will be assessed. The absence of electronic submission (e-submission) also creates an unnecessary barrier and reduces equal access for all potential bidders. The technical requirements appear appropriate for the project and not tailored.

The tender's practicality is severely hampered by the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. While contract duration and start date are clear, the absence of e-submission and potential issues with document access (one failed download) pose practical challenges for bidders.

The data is largely consistent, with no disputes or suspensions. However, there is a minor inconsistency in the submission deadline between the 'Timeline' and 'AI-EXTRACTED REQUIREMENTS' sections. Additionally, some fields like 'Liable Person', 'Type Code', and 'Procedure Code' are empty.

This tender shows a significant lack of focus on sustainability, with no explicit mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation aspects. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.