Fourniture de services de nettoyage d'intercepteurs et de maintenance d'alarmes Darcy sur l'ensemble du domaine TfGM

This tender for interceptor cleaning and alarm maintenance is generally well-structured with clear service descriptions, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the contract value and scope. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services required (interceptor cleaning, Darcy alarm maintenance, emergency services) is clear. The requirements for the tenderer to provide these services directly or via a subcontractor are well-defined. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult to fully assess the clarity of the selection process.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration is present. However, the lack of available content for the tender documents is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness. The reveal date for documents is also missing.

The tender is an open procedure, suggesting fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are focused on service provision rather than specific company capabilities. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory for submission.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs or content limit the practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The contract start date and submission deadline are logically ordered. No suspension or disputes are reported, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits the sustainability score.