Services de nettoyage - Université de Roskilde

This tender for cleaning services at Roskilde University is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a defined scope. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and fairness.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code, indicating a degree of regulatory compliance. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is debatable given the short timeframe. No disputes are noted. The procedure type is listed as 'None (Code: competition)' which is slightly ambiguous but likely refers to a standard competitive process.

The description of services, including cleaning and window washing, is clear and detailed. The reference to DS/INSTA800-1:2018 provides a specific standard. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify the scope. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and a description are present. Deadlines and duration (implied by service scope) are mentioned. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The number of attached documents is stated, but their content is not accessible in the provided text.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. Requirements are generally objective and based on technical standards. The lack of disclosed value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no clear indications of tailoring to specific companies.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. A submission deadline is provided. However, the lack of explicit contract start date and financing information, along with the absence of accessible document content, reduces overall practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadline, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical, with the notice date preceding the submission deadline. The AI-extracted requirement regarding multiple languages for submission appears to be a misinterpretation and does not reflect the tender's actual content.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided text. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria within this tender.