Trowbridge Town Council - Test et surveillance de la légionelle.

This tender for Legionella testing and monitoring is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a defined evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit mention of e-submission and sustainability criteria, and the availability of tender documents is not confirmed.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear procedure and appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of site visits and document review. No disputes are indicated.

The description of services, scope of works, and submission requirements are clearly articulated. Specific standards (BS7592, ACOP L8, HSG 274) are referenced, and site visits are offered for clarification. However, the evaluation criteria are presented as a weighting matrix without detailed scoring guidelines.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the content of essential documents like risk assessments and asset lists (Appendix A) is not directly accessible or summarized, and the number of available tender documents is listed as 0.

The tender is open competition, and the evaluation criteria are disclosed with weightings. Site visits are offered, and contact points for queries are provided, promoting transparency. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The value is disclosed, and an e-procurement system is implied by the submission requirements, though not explicitly stated.

The contract duration and start date are specified. Financing information is not detailed. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of an e-submission portal, which could impact the practicality for some bidders. The site visit dates are provided, which aids in practical planning.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the tender documentation. This category is therefore rated low.