Pratique réflexive

This tender is in the planning stage, seeking market engagement for psychological support services. It offers good clarity on service needs but lacks detailed submission and evaluation criteria.

The tender is in the planning stage, which explains the absence of a formal procedure and specific deadlines beyond the initial submission. The CPV code is provided, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. However, the 'None' for Procedure and Type suggests it's not yet a formal procurement, impacting the score.

The description clearly outlines the need for psychological support services, detailing the types of sessions (group reflective practice, serious incident response) and their purpose. The requirements for session scheduling and delivery methods (face-to-face, virtual) are well-defined. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. The submission deadline and contract start date are also provided. However, the lack of attached tender documents or their content summaries limits the completeness of the information available to potential bidders.

The tender appears fair, with the estimated value disclosed and the requirements described objectively. The deadline, while potentially short, is stated. There are no obvious indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly confirmed.

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, along with an estimated value and financing information (implied by value). However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs for access reduce practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically sequenced, with the contract start occurring after the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these areas.