Modernisation du complexe sportif "Moje Boisko - Orlik 2012" dans la localité de Tomaszowo, commune de Żagań

This tender for sports complex modernization is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, it lacks financial details and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. The submission deadline, while potentially short, is specified. No disputes are noted. The procedure type is not explicitly stated, which could be a minor point of ambiguity.

The description of the modernization works is clear and specific, detailing the scope for each area of the sports complex. The technical requirements are well-defined, allowing potential bidders to understand the scope of work.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, and a deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing. While 22 documents are listed, their content is not fully accessible or summarized, hindering a complete assessment.

The tender appears fair with objective technical requirements and e-procurement. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a slight disadvantage for bidders trying to gauge the project's scale and their chances of success.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information makes it less practical for bidders to plan comprehensively. The submission deadline might also be tight for complex renovations.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.